Junk Food Tax More Effective than Good Food Discounts

by Andrea Hill on February 26, 2010

Are incentives insufficient to encourage healthy eating? A recent study by researchers at the University of Buffalo in New York seems to indicate that’s the case.

Participants in the study were given a budget to shop for their family. In cases where the price of junk food was raised, healthier options were selected as an alternative. This would make sense: there is incentive to purchase the healthier, more economical options.

Yet there was a disturbing outcome when the prices of the healthy food was lowered: the mothers ‘treated’ their family by actually purchasing more junk food with the money they were saving.

Obviously, this study is tied to the fact that the mothers were given a particular budget, and therefore could have simply been aiming to spend the entire amount. But it begs the question of barriers: are disincentives more powerful than incentives?

{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Jess Colon-Polk 02.26.10 at 6:24 pm

I wonder what the outcome would have been if they received the extra cash? What would have happened if they used their own money?

2 Alex Bornkessel 02.28.10 at 8:26 pm

How interesting…do you have a link to the study?

3 Andrea Hill 03.03.10 at 1:17 pm

Whoops! I incorrectly coded the link to the study. Added now :)

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Previous post:

Next post: